Serve Up the Excitement: A Bold Proposal to Boost Doubles Attendance at the US Open
As the US Open continues to captivate tennis fans worldwide, there's an elephant in the room that needs addressing: the poor attendance at doubles matches, even during the later stages of the tournament. It's time for a game-changing approach to revitalize interest in this dynamic format of tennis. Here's a bold proposal: offer prize money to random ticket holders at doubles matches.
The Current State of Doubles Attendance
For the past decade, attendance at doubles matches, even in the semifinals and quarterfinals, has been disappointingly low. This is a disservice to the athletes who excel in this format and to the fans missing out on some thrilling tennis action.
The Proposal: Spectator Prize Money
Here's how the idea could work:
Random Draw: For each doubles match, a certain number of seat numbers would be randomly selected.
Tiered Prizes: The prize money could be tiered based on the stage of the tournament. For example:
- Early rounds: $1,000 per winner
- Quarterfinals: $2,500 per winner
- Semifinals: $5,000 per winner
- Finals: $10,000 per winner
Multiple Winners: Each match could have multiple winners to increase excitement and participation.
Attendance Requirement: To claim the prize, the ticket holder must be present in their seat when their number is drawn.
Potential Benefits
Increased Attendance: The chance to win a substantial prize would likely drive up ticket sales and attendance for doubles matches.
Enhanced Atmosphere: More spectators mean a better atmosphere for players and viewers alike.
Education Opportunity: As more fans attend doubles matches, they'll gain appreciation for the nuances and excitement of the format.
Media Buzz: This unique approach could generate additional media coverage for the tournament and doubles tennis in general.
Sponsor Opportunities: The prize giveaway could be sponsored, offsetting costs and creating new partnership opportunities.
Addressing Potential Concerns
Gambling Issues: Clear rules and transparent processes would need to be established to prevent any association with gambling.
Fairness: Ensure that the random selection process is truly random and verifiable.
Cost: While this represents an additional expense, the increased ticket sales and potential sponsorships could offset the cost.
Implementation Strategy
Pilot Program: Start with a limited run, perhaps just for the quarterfinals and semifinals in the first year.
Marketing Push: Heavily promote this new feature to drive initial interest.
Player Involvement: Get doubles players involved in promoting the initiative.
Data Collection: Carefully track attendance figures and fan feedback to measure the success of the program.
Conclusion
Tennis, like any sport, needs to innovate to maintain and grow its fan base. This proposal to offer prize money to spectators at doubles matches is admittedly unconventional, but it has the potential to breathe new life into an often-overlooked aspect of the US Open. By directly incentivizing attendance, we could create a win-win situation: fans get the chance at an unexpected windfall, and doubles tennis gets the audience it deserves.
As we look to the future of tennis, let's not be afraid to try bold new ideas. The serve is in the court of the US Open organizers – will they take a swing at this innovative approach?
Comments
Players like Edberg, Navratilova and McEnroe used to pull double duty. Those days are long gone.
The dubs isn't dead. Sabalenka and Coco have won slams in doubles. The attendance at the Open could be waaay better though.